<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gingrich for President in 2012?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gingrich-president-2012</link>
	<description>CONSERVATISM UNCOMPROMISED</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 17:12:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul Takes CPAC 2012 Straw Poll? &#124; REPUBLICAN REDEFINED</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul Takes CPAC 2012 Straw Poll? &#124; REPUBLICAN REDEFINED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>[...] that tend to drive traditional polling spoon fed to those of us on the Right in regards to &#8220;our choice&#8221; for 2012 candidate.  If you recall, they usually show Huckabee and Palin at or near the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that tend to drive traditional polling spoon fed to those of us on the Right in regards to &#8220;our choice&#8221; for 2012 candidate.  If you recall, they usually show Huckabee and Palin at or near the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE BOTTOM TEN: 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW &#124; REPUBLICAN REDEFINED</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>THE BOTTOM TEN: 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW &#124; REPUBLICAN REDEFINED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>[...] Newt Gingrich (Former Speaker of the House) &#8211; Has anyone really ever lost their target audience more quickly than Newt Gingrich did this year with his endorsement of Dede Scozzafava in the NY-23 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Newt Gingrich (Former Speaker of the House) &#8211; Has anyone really ever lost their target audience more quickly than Newt Gingrich did this year with his endorsement of Dede Scozzafava in the NY-23 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. CHRISTOPHER</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-796</guid>
		<description>See the bottom of this post... http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/17/huckabee-ahead-polls/

But in all seriousness.  He is the &quot;front-runner&quot; if the election were held today.  That has to mean something.  I happen to think it means people like his show, but I digress....

Huckabee is entertaining and a great pundit, but he just doesn&#039;t hold water as a legitimate candidate.  I like him as a man and even as a pundit, but as a candidate think he is right up there with Palin as a sideshow.  Thompson was the best horse in the race in &#039;08.  The only problem was that someone forgot to tell him it was a thoroughbred race rather than a walking horse show.  He never got out of the gate.  I like Huck for a lot of reasons, but not enough to ever cast a vote for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the bottom of this post&#8230; <a href="http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/17/huckabee-ahead-polls/" rel="nofollow">http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/17/huckabee-ahead-polls/</a></p>
<p>But in all seriousness.  He is the &#8220;front-runner&#8221; if the election were held today.  That has to mean something.  I happen to think it means people like his show, but I digress&#8230;.</p>
<p>Huckabee is entertaining and a great pundit, but he just doesn&#8217;t hold water as a legitimate candidate.  I like him as a man and even as a pundit, but as a candidate think he is right up there with Palin as a sideshow.  Thompson was the best horse in the race in &#8217;08.  The only problem was that someone forgot to tell him it was a thoroughbred race rather than a walking horse show.  He never got out of the gate.  I like Huck for a lot of reasons, but not enough to ever cast a vote for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marine1</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>marine1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Why not Huckabee? Though I will admit I don&#039;t know a lot about Pawlenty, I will say I value a successful executive of a legislator any day. Huckabee was the best one running in 08.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not Huckabee? Though I will admit I don&#8217;t know a lot about Pawlenty, I will say I value a successful executive of a legislator any day. Huckabee was the best one running in 08.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. CHRISTOPHER</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Chances would have been a lot better than this week - yes.  Still would take him over Palin but thats an entirely different issue and hopefully one I will not have to deliberate upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chances would have been a lot better than this week &#8211; yes.  Still would take him over Palin but thats an entirely different issue and hopefully one I will not have to deliberate upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingleo</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>kingleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-712</guid>
		<description>I would like to see this come to play.  1994 was a fine year.  I would like to see it relived in 2012.  I am pulling for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see this come to play.  1994 was a fine year.  I would like to see it relived in 2012.  I am pulling for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marinemanny</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/26/gingrich-president-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>marinemanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=2692#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Am I wrong or would you have supported this before last week&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I wrong or would you have supported this before last week&gt;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

