Comments on: Lieberman to Vote with Republicans to Block “Public Option”

By: THE BOTTOM TEN: 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED

THE BOTTOM TEN: 2009 YEAR IN REVIEW | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:24:12 +0000

[...] Dems hope that their bill would eventually find bipartisan support. She claimed that she still had concerns about the bill, but she was willing to let it get out of committee. Newsflash…it was getting out either way [...]

By: fhlwgxyioip

fhlwgxyioip — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:04:14 +0000

U3KgcF asaxgosczuvd, [url=http://dqnqvlrlnvax.com/]dqnqvlrlnvax[/url], [link=http://awqbdmojclwk.com/]awqbdmojclwk[/link], http://ubhakjjgznjg.com/

By: T. CHRISTOPHER

T. CHRISTOPHER — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:23:13 +0000

Yes there was a bit of a typo. Thankfully I caught it relatively early on. The original title was an attempt at humor and involved a play on the word Lieberman and Liberal. Needless to say it was not funny and I decided to scrap it. Unfortunately my spellcheck thought it was a great joke and allowed me to change Lieberman to LIberman throughout the post. A loyal reader shared it with me in confidence. I do appreciate your forwarding on the post to others. The gesture is much appreciated.

By: T. CHRISTOPHER

T. CHRISTOPHER — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:20:45 +0000

I agree with all of you to a certain degree. I firmly believe that there is more at play here than a simple vote, but I honestly could care less. Lieberman is not a defecting Republican. He is a former Dem coming over to the Right side on this issue. I see it as nothing more and nothing less. Am I happy that he is/did? You bet. I want to see this bill die a quick yet agonizing death on the floor of the Senate. Then and only then can we get around to actual healthcare reform.

By: Lucian

Lucian — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:12:59 +0000

I think you had Lieberman misspelled last night – I wanted to comment but I see you corrected it. I forwarded the message on five times before I realized it was misspelled too.

By: sophie

sophie — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:30:40 +0000

Only because that is what it is. Lieberman still bears great resentment for a party that abandoned him. He was just giving it back to the Party that ran someone against him. This was written in the script months ago.

By: Mark Lofton

Mark Lofton — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:33:03 +0000

I am glad to see that Lieberman came around on this one, but I believe it will be perceived on Capitol Hill as merely political retribution.

By: marinemanny

marinemanny — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:32:11 +0000

Lieberman fighting back.. They totally shafted him so he just wanted to be the first to return the favor. More will follow his lead now that he broke the 60.

By: mcdonnell

mcdonnell — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:06:52 +0000

Good for Liberman. If you cant go it alone as an Independent what the hells the point of being an independent. They screwed him now he is screwing them. Awesome