<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Compromise Gaining Support Sight Unseen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://republicanredefined.com/2009/12/11/senate-compromise-gaining-support-sight-unseen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/12/11/senate-compromise-gaining-support-sight-unseen/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=senate-compromise-gaining-support-sight-unseen</link>
	<description>CONSERVATISM UNCOMPROMISED</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenux</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/12/11/senate-compromise-gaining-support-sight-unseen/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>lenux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=4422#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>Mariah I have to respectfully tell you that youre nuts.  Letting this go on in this manner is just a show.  It is a way around calling it a single payer or a public option and yes that is a bad thing.  Extending coverage to 55 and older will bankrupt the system and drive up the costs for the private sectors.  Medicare works - if you think it works - by requiring lower payments from doctors and hospitals they will just stop seeing medicare patients and problem solved.  THey all go back to the roles of the uninsured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mariah I have to respectfully tell you that youre nuts.  Letting this go on in this manner is just a show.  It is a way around calling it a single payer or a public option and yes that is a bad thing.  Extending coverage to 55 and older will bankrupt the system and drive up the costs for the private sectors.  Medicare works &#8211; if you think it works &#8211; by requiring lower payments from doctors and hospitals they will just stop seeing medicare patients and problem solved.  THey all go back to the roles of the uninsured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariah</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2009/12/11/senate-compromise-gaining-support-sight-unseen/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>mariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=4422#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>I cannot see what is even remotely wrong with allowing elderly Americans to buy into Medicare.  Afterall, republicans have been telling us how it must be protected.  I believe that impliedly means that it works and if so, it should be able to be extended to other Americans in need.  55 if not far from 65 and they are still rather old Americans with many of them unable to care for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot see what is even remotely wrong with allowing elderly Americans to buy into Medicare.  Afterall, republicans have been telling us how it must be protected.  I believe that impliedly means that it works and if so, it should be able to be extended to other Americans in need.  55 if not far from 65 and they are still rather old Americans with many of them unable to care for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

