Comments on: Justice Antonin Scalia: The Supreme Court Needs Fewer “Judges”

By: Scalia Silences Kagan's Judicial Experience Critics | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED

Scalia Silences Kagan's Judicial Experience Critics | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED — Fri, 28 May 2010 16:39:57 +0000

[...] Justice Antonin Scalia: The Supreme Court Needs Fewer “Judges” By T. CHRISTOPHER [...]

By: Conservative Justice Scalia on Kagan and Non-Judge Justices | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED

Sun, 16 May 2010 19:53:13 +0000

[...] Justice Antonin Scalia: The Supreme Court Needs Fewer “Judges” By T. CHRISTOPHER [...]

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 11 May 2010 12:08:35 +0000

Your point is well taken. I went at it with some idiot on Twitter (don’t judge me) today for a bit who literally was incredulous when I told him that no, jackass, the Constitution is NOT a living, breathing document and that its underlying philosophy is as grounded in 1787 as it is today. The respective philosophies that result in conditions of individual liberty or slavery are more or less etched in stone for all time. Scalia gets this. Thomas gets this. Reagan got that.
+1

By: Justice Thomas Defends Citizens Ruling | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED

Justice Thomas Defends Citizens Ruling | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:38:34 +0000

[...] Justice Antonin Scalia: The Supreme Court Needs Fewer “Judges” By T. CHRISTOPHER [...]

By: T. CHRISTOPHER

T. CHRISTOPHER — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:31:36 +0000

Much appreciated man. I won’t hold the Twitter thing against you either… for now.

By: thatsright

thatsright — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:19:51 +0000

Terrific post. When I was in law school there were literally only a handful of judges we read that I could even stomach. Scalia was and is hands down the best I’ve ever read, not only because he’s usually right, but because he writes so much more eloquently than the rest.

It’s our job today to make sure as many people as possible also get that.

Good post.