Key Global Warming Scientist Says NO Warming Since 1995
Before we dive too deeply into this story, I should acknowledge two points. While I don’t buy into the whole “People are terrible… We’re burning up the planet and have to free ourselves of all the perks of innovation and technology thing… I do believe that our presence as a People on this wonderful little planet is and will continue to leave a mark. That being said, so too does the cow population, and until we can get them to limit their “bovine gas emissions” I’m holding on to the gas-powered car and the BBQ grill.
All that being said, this is one hell of a story. Professor Phil Jones – a scientist at the center of the Global Warming debate and the Climate Gate email fiasco told the BBC yesterday there was “truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organizational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be” according to Daily Mail. It appears that scientists were far more concerned with turning out the numbers and producing the headlines than they were with actually keeping credible records to support their “findings.”
(February 13, 2010 - Photo by PacificCoastNews.com)
Jones went on to deliver an even bigger blow to Global Warming alarmists when he dropped the bombshell that there has been “no statistical warming” in the last fifteen years AND that the evidence supporting the “Hockey Stick Graph” is missing AND that our climate may actually cooler than it was in Medieval times suggesting that the whole phenomenon is about as man-made as Pamela Anderson’s breasts and Joan Rivers’s face…
Left Coast Rebel suggests something else might be at play here. The timing of this “revelation” is somewhat peculiar…
Via – American Power
Phil ‘Hide the Decline’ Jones Admits Faked Data
Photo Via Weasel Zippers
Via Memeorandum
Trackback URL
Why do you conservatives have to fight this war with Global Climate Change? It just makes you look so simple minded. Science is science. This is one scientist not everyone involved in proving the theory to be true.
You say it’s science, Rebecca, yet it has more in common with religion than actual science.
Opposing it is like a religion to the Right. The rest of us just accept it as any other science. We analyze the data and see if it is verified and once a consensus is reached we begin to accept it as approaching a fact rather than a theory.
George Bush And Republicans Responsible For D.C. Blizzard…
Faced with one of the coldest and snowiest winters on record, Democrats have been scrambling for a logical explanation as to the cause for this extreme weather in light of the fact that global warming is “settled science,” as the Administra…