So is WikiLeaks a testament to the importance of transparency in government and a tribute to investigative journalism; or is it nothing more than a distributor of lies and propaganda? You’re going to have to pick one fat man, because I can’t seem to keep up.
Just days after you announced that you were going to help bail Wiki-co-founder Julian Assange out of jail, you release this heartwarming little diatribe detailing the inaccuracies of Wiki-content? Pardon me if I’m a little confused.
I guess we should start from the beginning.
The Guardian ran this story – “WikiLeaks: Cuba banned Sicko for depicting ‘mythical’ healthcare system” which was picked up by a number of outlets – including this one.
The revelation, contained in a confidential US embassy cable released by WikiLeaks , is surprising, given that the film attempted to discredit the US healthcare system by highlighting what it claimed was the excellence of the Cuban system.
But the memo reveals that when the film was shown to a group of Cuban doctors, some became so “disturbed at the blatant misrepresentation of healthcare in Cuba that they left the room”.
Castro’s government apparently went on to ban the film because, the leaked cable claims, it “knows the film is a myth and does not want to risk a popular backlash by showing to Cubans facilities that are clearly not available to the vast majority of them.”
—-
Which prompted this response from Michael Moore… - ¡Viva WikiLeaks! SiCKO Was Not Banned in Cuba
The date is January 31, 2008. It is just days after ‘Sicko’ has been nominated for an Oscar as Best Documentary. This must have sent someone reeling in Bush’s State Department (his Treasury Department had already notified me they were investigating what laws I might have broken in taking three 9/11 first responders to Cuba to get them the health care they had been denied in the United States).
Former health insurance executive Wendell Potter recently revealed that the insurance industry — which had decided to spend millions to go after me and, if necessary, “push Michael Moore off a cliff” — had begun working with anti-Castro Cubans in Miami in order to have them speak out and smear my film.
So, on January 31, 2008, a State Department official stationed in Havana took a made up story and sent it back to his HQ in Washington. Here’s what they concocted:
XXXXXXXXXXXX stated that Cuban authorities have banned Michael Moore’s documentary, “Sicko,” as being subversive. Although the film’s intent is to discredit the U.S. healthcare system by highlighting the excellence of the Cuban system, he said the regime knows the film is a myth and does not want to risk a popular backlash by showing to Cubans facilities that are clearly not available to the vast majority of them.
Sounds convincing, eh?! There’s only one problem — ‘Sicko’ had just been playing in Cuban theaters. Then the entire nation of Cuba was shown the film on national television on April 25, 2008! The Cubans embraced the film so much so it became one of those rare American movies that received a theatrical distribution in Cuba. I personally ensured that a 35mm print got to the Film Institute in Havana. Screenings of ‘Sicko’ were set up in towns all across the country.
But the secret cable said Cubans were banned from seeing my movie. Hmmm.
-
He then posted this business to show real journalists how to do their jobs… I guess he learned how to Google.
-
June 16, 2007 Saturday 1:41 AM GMT [that's 7 months before the false cable]
HEADLINE: Cuban health minister says Moore’s ‘Sicko’ shows ‘human values’ of communist system
BYLINE: By ANDREA RODRIGUEZ, Associated Press Writer
DATELINE: HAVANA
Cuba’s health minister Jose Ramon Balaguer said Friday that American filmmaker Michael Moore’s documentary ‘Sicko’ highlights the human values of the island’s communist-run government… “There can be no doubt this documentary by a personality like Mr. Michael Moore helps promote the profoundly human principles of Cuban society.”
The documentary Sicko, the U.S. filmmaker Michael Moore, which deals about the deplorable state of American health care system will be released today at 5:50 pm, for the space Cubavision Roundtable and the Education Channel.
Or, how ’bout this little April 25, 2008 notice from CubaSi.Cu (translation by Google):
Sicko premiere in Cuba25/04/2008
Then there’s this from Juventudrebelde.cu (translation by Google). Or this Cuban editorial (translation by Google). There’s even a long clip of the Cuba section of ‘Sicko’ on the homepage of Media Roundtable on theCubaSi.cu website!
——–
Okay, so let me get this straight… Michael Moore’s idea of investigative journalism is finding two sources that cite an alleged premier date and time? That is supposed to be conclusive evidence that the film, in fact, aired and that there were actual people there to see it? And that is supposed to be conclusive evidence that it wasn’t subsequently pulled or “banned” once the Cuban government caught wind of the content and realized that its health care system was but a shell of the dreamlike institution Moore was depicting therein?
In fairness, Moore did add this. Notice this is his own (Michael Moore) account – not evidence verified by a second or third party.
—-
Notice the language. What’s missing? Ratings, attendance, box office numbers? Subsequent airings on “national television?” Could it be that all of these things were “set up” but never actually transpired or came to fruition? Could the Cuban government have pulled the plug once it saw the initial reaction reported in the Guardian piece?
——–
Maybe, just maybe, Sicko was to be premiered in a similar fashion in Cuba as it was here in the States…
‘SiCKO’ Sneaks Across America This Saturday!
It also seems rather odd that Moore wasn’t quite as bragadocious about his Cuban release as he was his American debut…
An Awesome First Night for “Sicko”
Thank you so much to the hundreds of thousands of you who went to see my movie last night and this afternoon. The studio tells me that we are on track to have the second largest opening weekend for a documentary in the history of the movies! (“Fahrenheit 9/11″ was first.) Many theaters have been selling out. The Bush administration’s investigation of this movie is certainly not keeping people away. Thanks for all the pictures you sent me of people packing in to see “Sicko!”
The movie is making impact big and small. I thought you would enjoy this story about a family that Aetna was forcing to pay a $65,000 hospital bill that the insurance company was supposed to cover!
If you haven’t seen “Sicko,” go see it tonight. I want this film to have as much impact as it can. How well it does in terms of attendance this first weekend will determine how many other towns get to see it. It’s all about the “first weekend box office” with the studios these days. If it does well in the 400 theaters it’s in, they will put it in more theaters next weekend. And trust me, the White House and their friends in the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries know this, too. It’s no surprise to me that an original master of “Sicko” was stolen and widely distributed on the internet before the film’s release. I’m one of the few people in the movie business who doesn’t believe in prosecuting teenagers who want to share music or films (although I make my movies to be seen on a big screen and that’s how I hope people see them!). I called up Mr. Bush’s FBI last week. I wanted to know if they had asked themselves the first question any cop would ask about this particularly unique theft:
Last night, the industry polled the people coming out of “Sicko.” 93% said they would “strongly recommend ‘Sicko’” to their friends and family. The pollster said he’d never seen a number that high (the norm for most movies is about 45%). It was a heartening piece of news.
——
Interesting how fixated on numbers he is in these remarks. Where are the stats, figures, and polling data from the Cuban release? Oh that’s right. He did say
I think I see the equal level of excitement there…
Attempting to do my due diligence on the matter, rather than simply Googling the topic as Moore did for his demonstration of “investigative journalism”, I turned to Michael Moore’s personal site.
I searched MichaelMoore.com for a similar reaction to the Cuban release. If it was such a momentous occasion, viewed by all, there must have been something on the filmmaker’s site commemorating the achievement. I found absolutely nothing. Zip, zilch, zero, nada.
Give it a shot for yourself if you’d like. Try “sicko”, “sicko premier”, even “sicko Cuba”; and you will get nothing.
If it was such a momentous occasion, why the lack of headlines? He seemed pretty fixated on the Big Day, and on how many people were coming out to see it in North America. What explains the similar lack of interest on Moore’s part for the people in Cuba coming out to see it? Maybe because they didn’t even know about it? Maybe because it had been banned?
As Michael Moore himself likes to say, “hmmmmm.” Yes hmmm. Hmmm Indeed!!
Where’s the Havana Premier Photo Mr. Moore?
Via HotAir: It seems that WikiLeaks wasn’t the first to break this banned in Cuba story… Check out what Ed Morrissey came up with from a simple Google search.
Oh the irony of the fat man’s plight – via Doug Powers at Michelle Malkin








[...] is reporting that terrorist investigations make Muslims sad.Republican Redefined has a post on Michael Moore’s Wikileaks leak.OK, here are some other Christmas songs…Right Klik is covering the War on Christmas.Reaganite [...]
[...] last beacon of hope for investigative journalism slash Michael Moore says WikiLeaks tells lies - My Movie wasn’t banned in Cuba – fiasco, was a slight little reference that only a true fan of the Fox News program Red Eye [...]
[...] Michael Moore Defends WikiLeaks and Attacks the Right for “Lies” about “Sicko” [...]