In an interview with UC Hastings law professor Calvin Massey for the California Lawyer, Justice Antonin Scalia answered a few questions regarding the Nation’s Highest Court and explained with brilliant simplicity his take on Strict Interpretation of the Constitution.
You can read the whole interview here…
A few highlights…
You believe in an enduring constitution rather than an evolving constitution. What does that mean to you? What do you do when the original meaning of a constitutional provision is either in doubt or is unknown? You more or less grew up in New York. Being a child of Sicilian immigrants, how do you think New York City pizza rates?
In its most important aspects, the Constitution tells the current society that it cannot do [whatever] it wants to do. It is a decision that the society has made that in order to take certain actions, you need the extraordinary effort that it takes to amend the Constitution. Now if you give to those many provisions of the Constitution that are necessarily broad—such as due process of law, cruel and unusual punishments, equal protection of the laws—if you give them an evolving meaning so that they have whatever meaning the current society thinks they ought to have, they are no limitation on the current society at all. If the cruel and unusual punishments clause simply means that today’s society should not do anything that it considers cruel and unusual, it means nothing except, “To thine own self be true.”
I do not pretend that originalism is perfect. There are some questions you have no easy answer to, and you have to take your best shot. … We don’t have the answer to everything, but by God we have an answer to a lot of stuff … especially the most controversial: whether the death penalty is unconstitutional, whether there’s a constitutional right to abortion, to suicide, and I could go on. All the most controversial stuff. … I don’t even have to read the briefs, for Pete’s sake.
I think it is infinitely better than Washington pizza, and infinitely better than Chicago pizza. You know these deep-dish pizzas—it’s not pizza. It’s very good, but … call it tomato pie or something. … I’m a traditionalist, what can I tell you?
You believe in an enduring constitution rather than an evolving constitution. What does that mean to you?
What do you do when the original meaning of a constitutional provision is either in doubt or is unknown?
You more or less grew up in New York. Being a child of Sicilian immigrants, how do you think New York City pizza rates?
HuffPo wasn’t pleased. Shocker.