<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>REPUBLICAN REDEFINED &#187; CONSERVATISM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://republicanredefined.com/category/conservatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://republicanredefined.com</link>
	<description>CONSERVATISM UNCOMPROMISED</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Right Wing Extremists: April 9, 2010</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/04/09/right-wing-extremists-april-9-2010/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=right-wing-extremists-april-9-2010</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/04/09/right-wing-extremists-april-9-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left coast rebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thats right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whited sepulchre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a few posts / articles / pieces of commentary certainly worth a few minutes of your time.  Bookmark a few of these sites folks... There's some good reading to be found among them.  Much better than the intermittent nonsense you find around here...  Enjoy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F04%252F09%252Fright-wing-extremists-april-9-2010%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20April%209%2C%202010%22%20%7D);"></div>
<h3><a rel="attachment wp-att-5138" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/01/12/right-wing-news/right_wing_declaration/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5138" title="right_wing_declaration" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/right_wing_declaration-500x328.jpg" alt="" width="270" height="177" /></a></h3>
<h3>Here are a few posts / articles / pieces of commentary certainly worth a few minutes of your time.  Bookmark a few of these sites folks&#8230; There&#8217;s some good reading to be found among them.  Much better than the intermittent nonsense you find around here&#8230;  Enjoy.</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><br />
</span></span></strong></span></p>
<h3><a href="http://anotherblackconservative.blogspot.com/2010/04/something-wicked-this-way-comes-vat-tax.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000000;">Something wicked this way comes: The VAT tax</span></a><span style="color: #000000;"> &#8211; ANOTHER BLACK CONSERVATIVE</span></h3>
<p>Something dark and evil is brewing over the horizon in Washington. It comes from the bowels of European socialist model soon to be transplanted in the heart of America by our socialism loving Congress. It’s the VAT tax!</p>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/04/bullsht-al-madadi-may-have-said-he-was-going-to-light-his-shoes-on-fire-to-cover-up-that-he-was-smoking/" target="_blank">BULLSH!T: “Al-Madadi may have said he was going to light his shoes on fire to cover up that he was smoking.”</a> &#8211; FOUNDING BLOGGERS</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >A man with striking similarities to the profile of a potential terrorist attempted to light something on fire on board an aircraft yesterday.</p>
<p>If officials and alleged news outlets are to be believed, there is probably nothing to see here.</p>
<p>Note how <a href="http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?storyid=78942&amp;catid=2" target="_blank">the article below</a> characterizes the behavior of the suspect as a matter of fact. He was trying to sneak a smoke and that’s all there is to it. Just a big misunderstanding (emphases added in <strong>bold</strong>).</div>
<h2><a href="http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/04/what-relief-cows-not-guilty-for-global.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #808080;">&#8220;What a Relief: Cows Not Guilty For Global Warming&#8221;</span></a><span style="color: #808080;"> &#8211; LEFT COAST REBEL</span></h2>
<p>To eat, or not to eat &#8211; red meat. One thing that I have noticed in the recent history of global warming fear mongering is urban California residents that abstain from eating red meat (read: cows) because doing so contributes to global warming. I kid you not, our society, or at least the left coast version of it, has come down to this.</p>
<h3 id="post-19005"><a title="Putting Insurers Out of Business" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.lonelyconservative.com/2010/04/09/putting-insurers-out-of-business/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000000;">Putting Insurers Out of Business</span></a> &#8211; THE LONELY CONSERVATIVE</h3>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >The Democrats knew full well when they passed Obamacare that eventually it will put health insurance companies out of business. They can’t claim to be too stupid to understand basic math because there was no need for them to understand. All they had to do was look to Massachusetts for a perfect example of what will happen. And things just keep getting worse there.</div>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/friday-funnies-04-09-10/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #333333;">Friday Funnies – 04-09-10</span></a><span style="color: #333333;"> &#8211; POLITICAL REALITIES</span></h2>
<p>It’s time once again for another weekly edition of Friday Funnies. For your enjoyment, here are the editorial and political cartoons I found particularly amusing this week, with one exception.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/4/7/paul-volcker-has-lost-his-fing-mind.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #fb0d03;">Paul Volcker has lost his f&#8217;ing mind</span></a><span style="color: #fb0d03;"> &#8211; That&#8217;s Right</span></h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' ><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6355N520100406#">Not as toxic as it has been in the past</a>? He can’t be serious. Can he? The architect of Reaganomics is trying to tell the American people that the VAT is <em>less</em> toxic today than it was in the past?</p>
<p>Volcker, answering a question from the audience at a New York Historical Society event, said the value-added tax “was not as toxic an idea” as it has been in the past and also said a carbon or other energy-related tax may become necessary.</p>
<p></div>
<h2><a title="Race Card Just As Ugly When Played By Republicans" href="http://www.stridentconservative.com/?p=1248" target="_blank">Race Card Just As Ugly When Played By Republicans</a> &#8211; Strident Conservative</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' ></p>
<p>Playing the race card has become the modus operandi for the loony-left whenever they are forced to defend the policies of the Socialist-in-Chief. We’ve heard it from his friends, his advisors and <a href="http://newsmax.com/RonaldKessler/obama-race-gates/2009/07/21/id/331814" target="_blank">even himself</a>.</p>
<p>There were <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2010/mar/20/congressman-claims-health-care-bill-protesters-hur/" target="_blank">members of Congress</a>- both minority and non-minority - who falsely played the race card during the unpopular healthcare hijacking.</p>
<p></div>
<h2><a href="http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/04/09/stupak-to-retire-betting-pool-on-his-next-job-now-open/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Stupak to Retire, Betting Pool on His ‘Next Job’ Now Open</span></a><span style="color: #0000ff;"> &#8211; BIG GOVERNMENT</span></h2>
<p>Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak, targeted for defeat by Tea Party activists for his crucial role in securing House approval of the health care overhaul, said Friday he would retire from Congress this year.</p>
<h3><a title="Permanent Link to A “threat” against Christie from New Jersey teachers union?" rel="bookmark" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/09/a-threat-against-christie-from-new-jersey-teachers-union/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #800000;">A “threat” against Christie from New Jersey teachers union?</span></a><span style="color: #800000;"> &#8211; HOT AIR</span></h3>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >The silliness over “threats” from political rhetoric may have <a href="http://wcbstv.com/local/governor.christie.union.2.1621917.html">peaked today</a>, and this time it looks like conservatives are in danger of becoming shrieking hysterics.  The Bergen County teachers union offered a “prayer” in a memo that asked the Lord to call New Jersey Governor Chris Christie home to his reward.  Some will offer this as a<em>tu quoque</em>, but that’s as much of a joke as the prayer itself:</div>
<h2><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/09/gird-your-loins-justice-stevens-announces-summer-retirement-plans/" target="_blank">Gird your loins: Justice Stevens announces summer retirement plans</a> &#8211; MICHELLE MALKIN</h2>
<p>It’s Retirement Friday! On the heels of Democrat Rep. Bart Stupak’s retirement plans, SCOTUS Justice John Paul Stevens confirms swirling rumors of his upcoming retirement this summer. News breaking on the<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EVJKQO2&amp;show_article=1">wires</a> and Twitter. AP:</p>
<h3><a rel="bookmark" href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/04/09/obama-bans-phrases-from-english-language/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #008000;">Obama bans phrases from English language.</span></a><span style="color: #008000;"> &#8211; CONSERVATIVE HIDEOUT 2.0</span></h3>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >President Barack Obama’s advisers will remove religious terms such as “<strong><em>Islamic extremism</em></strong>” from the central document outlining the U.S. national security strategy and will use the rewritten document to emphasize that the United States does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terror, counterterrorism officials said.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/04/09/right-wing-extremists-april-9-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right Wing Extremists April 1, 2010</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/04/01/right-wing-extremists-april-1-2010/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=right-wing-extremists-april-1-2010</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/04/01/right-wing-extremists-april-1-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political realities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thats right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whited sepulchre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have admittedly been a little off the radar as of late, but I have been consistently following many of my favorite sites even in my brief sabbatical from the daily blog world and thought I would post a few pieces of Right Wing propaganda for your enjoyment.  Have a look. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F04%252F01%252Fright-wing-extremists-april-1-2010%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Right%20Wing%20Extremists%20April%201%2C%202010%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5138" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/01/12/right-wing-news/right_wing_declaration/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5138" title="right_wing_declaration" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/right_wing_declaration-500x328.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a></p>
<p>I have admittedly been a little off the radar as of late, but I have been consistently following many of my favorite sites even in my brief sabbatical from the daily blog world and thought I would post a few pieces of Right Wing propaganda for your enjoyment.  Have a look.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/31/a-justice-mcnamara-dispatch-we-can-toll-the-bell-forever.html" target="_blank">A Justice McNamara Dispatch: We Can Toll the Bell Forever</a> &#8211; That&#8217;s Right</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >By repealing it, you’re saying ‘<em>don’t worry, if Democrats are in power we can change what they did</em>’. Ok fine.</p>
<p><em>But</em>…a <em>better</em> argument is ‘<em>don’t let them get into power to begin with</em>’ because when they do this is the result. While we can’t promise that repeal will work, what we <em>can</em> promise is this..don’t vote them into office and you can be <em>certain</em> it won’t happen.</div>
<h2><a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/29/no-guaranteed-issue-and-the-law-of-unintended-consequences.html" target="_blank">No &#8220;guaranteed issue&#8221; and the law of unintended consequences.</a> &#8211; That&#8217;s Right</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >How long do you expect it will be before Potato Head Waxman and Silver Spoon Rockefeller haul the CEO&#8217;s of all major health insurers before a Congressional committee to explain their reading of the law?</p>
<p>I give it two weeks, tops. Remember you heard it here first.</p>
<p>So now, <em>because of ObamaCare</em>, there is the distinct possibility that children and families who <em>may otherwise have been covered</em> (sans pre-existing conditions) will now <em>not</em> be covered at all <em>because of</em> the pre-existing condition provision.</div>
<h2><a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/previews-of-obamacare.html" target="_blank">Preview of Obamacare</a> &#8211; Makes My Brain Itch</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' ></p>
<p>On February 7, a Pittsburgh man died at home after ten calls to 911 failed to bring the EMS services he needed. According to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hk4AqpNPv42hQySi2em06Fym-WhwD9E5B6P00">the AP story</a>, Curtis Mitchell and his common-law wife Sharon Edge made their first calls for help in the early hours of February 6. Help never came.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I&#8217;m very angry, because I feel they didn&#8217;t do their job like they supposed to,&#8221; said Edge, 51. &#8220;My man would still be living if they&#8217;da did they job like they was supposed to &#8230; They took somebody that I love away.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>This was in the middle of &#8220;Snowmageddon&#8221;, which dropped over 20 inches of snow in Pittsburgh. But according to the city&#8217;s public safety director Michael Huss, it&#8217;s no excuse.</div>
<h2><a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/conservative-blogger-debate-is-third.html" target="_blank">Is a Third Party Vote a Wasted Vote?</a> &#8211; Makes My Brain Itch</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >I think it proves instead the point I&#8217;m trying to make. The trouble with NY-23 wasn&#8217;t knowledgeable voters resisting a RINO liberal and breaking for the third party candidate. The problem was an arrogant Republican Party that ignored those voters, then sent Newt Gingrich to tell the common folk what was best for them. Had the Republican establishment thrown their support behind the popular and desired conservative candidate, Hoffman and the GOP would have <em>both</em> won &#8211; as would the voters.</div>
<h2><a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/odds_n_ends/a-tale-of-2-podiums" target="_blank">A Tale of Two Podiums &#8211; Christie vs Obama</a> &#8211; The WY Blog</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >NJ Governor Chris Christie <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/nj_gov_chris_christie_gears_up.html" target="_blank">visited Montclair High School yesterday</a> to discuss his budget cuts with teachers and students. The governor answered tough questions from seniors in a U.S. government and politics class. And did it from behind a simple wooden podium. No TelePrompTers. No gubernatorial seal. Relaxed posture, at ease with the situation.</div>
<h2><a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/obamacare/irs-has-authority-for-indiv-mandate" target="_blank">The IRS has sufficient authority to enforce the individual mandate in Obamacare </a>- The Wy Blog</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Setting aside the Constitutionality of the mandate for a moment the validity of its enforcement by the IRS opens up some very interesting questions. For starters, what else can Congress mandate that we must do under penalty of having the IRS make our lives even more miserable?</p>
<p>How about <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/29/video-could-the-feds-require-americans-to-purchase-gm-cars/">forcing every American to buy a car from Government Motors</a>?</div>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/the-catholic-church-and-its-scandals/" target="_blank">The Catholic Church and it’s scandals</a> &#8211; Political Realities</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Has it only been a few short years since the Catholic Church weathered one of the biggest storms of it’s very long lifetime? Beginning in the early 1980s, the news of more and more Catholic priests who were guilty of the sexual abuse of some of their young, male parishioners started to emerge. The scandals peaked in 2002, with allegation after.</div>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/cartoons-for-the-politically-inclined/" target="_blank">Cartoons for the politically inclined</a> &#8211; Political Realities</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >A lot of serious topics have been discussed on Political Realities during the course of it’s existence. The Presidential elections, the economy, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now the debate over health care reform. Maybe no one else gets to feeling this way, but I wonder sometimes if we do not need to take a step back and chill out.</div>
<h2><a title="Too Bad Netanyahu Isn’t Muslim" href="http://www.stridentconservative.com/?p=1208" target="_blank">Too Bad Netanyahu Isn’t Muslim</a> &#8211; The Strident Conservative</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Ever since he assumed the office of President, the anointed one has gone to great lengths to “extend an open hand” to Muslims around the world, even those intent on the destruction of the United States and her allies. However, even these facts fail to explain the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/25/president-allegedly-dumps-israeli-prime-minister-dinner/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Text+-+Politics%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher" target="_blank">total disregard displayed by the White House</a> towards the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, during his recent visit.</div>
<h2><a title="What Do College And Colds Have In Common?" href="http://www.stridentconservative.com/?p=1156" target="_blank">What Do College And Colds Have In Common?</a> &#8211; The Strident Conservative</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Well, let’s see. . .</p>
<ol>
<li>They both start with the letter “C”</li>
<li>Both of them can give you a headache</li>
<li>They both can make you want to stay in bed all day</li>
<li>Both of them tend to involve alcohol for “medicinal” purposes</li>
<li>The will both be covered under Obamacare</li>
</ol>
<p></div>
<h2><a title="The Only Way Out of this Mess" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.lonelyconservative.com/2010/03/31/the-only-way-out-of-this-mess/" target="_blank">The Only Way Out of this Mess</a> &#8211; The Lonely Conservative</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Professor Glenn Reynolds (<a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/" target="_self">Instapundit</a>) talked to Professor Randy Barnett of Georgetown University (<a href="http://volokh.com/" target="_self">Volokh Conspiracy</a>) about the Constitutionality of Obamacare and what to do about it. <a href="http://www.pjtv.com/v/3325" target="_self">This is a must see video</a>.</div>
<h2><a href="http://anotherblackconservative.blogspot.com/2010/04/run-for-your-lives-democrats-target.html" target="_blank">Run for your lives! Democrats “target” Republicans</a> &#8211; Another Black Conservative</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Once again the sensitive sensibilities of the left is just an act. It turns out that they are every bit as evil as Palin. Actually even more evil because they thought of it first! Check out some of these lefty maps from 2004 and 2009.</div>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/03/31/prussian-state-socialism-comes-to-america/" target="_blank">Prussian State Socialism Comes to America</a> &#8211; Conservative Hideout 2.0</h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >In Michigan, I have observed what happens when Democrats run government, and I predicted accurately what would happen if Obama and the Democrats won the elections of 2008. Democrats turned Michigan into Detroit, and Democrats are now turning the United States into Michigan. You need to make sure that everyone you know votes Republican next election, or else your kids will grow up in a nation that is less civil, less prosperous, and less free than then one they are growing up in now.</div>
<h2><a href="http://" target="_blank">My favorite April Fool&#8217;s Joke </a>- The Whited Sepulchre</h2>
<p><em> <div class='stb-grey_box' ><em>I&#8217;m probably going to re-post this every April Fool&#8217;s Day until I die.  When I linked it on Facebook for the first time, my college roommate, Scott Moore, declared the entire prank to have been &#8220;brilliantly conceived and flawlessly executed&#8221;. </em><br />
<em>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  I&#8217;ve changed a name or two, in light of about 500 people having different memories of how they heard it first.</em></div></em></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/04/01/right-wing-extremists-april-1-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James O&#8217;Keefe, Joe Basel, and Cohorts Face Reduced Charges in Break-in Scandal</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/27/james-okeefe-joe-basel-and-cohorts-face-reduced-charges-in-break-in-scandal/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=james-okeefe-joe-basel-and-cohorts-face-reduced-charges-in-break-in-scandal</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/27/james-okeefe-joe-basel-and-cohorts-face-reduced-charges-in-break-in-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hannah giles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james okeefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe basel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary landrieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misdemeanor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James O'Keefe, Joe Basel, Robert Flanagan, and Stan Dai are in the news again this week/weekend as it appears the long and drawn out saga of the "Louisiana Four" is finally heading toward a conclusion.  Federal prosecutors have reportedly reduced charges against the men in exchange for guilty pleas.  They are all now being charged with a misdemeanor - entering a Federal Building under false pretenses - a crime punishable by up to six months in prison.  The "scandal" centered around what amounted to not much more than a teenage prank on Senator Landrieu's office staff although it was widely reported to be a heinous act of espionage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F03%252F27%252Fjames-okeefe-joe-basel-and-cohorts-face-reduced-charges-in-break-in-scandal%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22James%20O%27Keefe%2C%20Joe%20Basel%2C%20and%20Cohorts%20Face%20Reduced%20Charges%20in%20Break-in%20Scandal%22%20%7D);"></div>
<div id="attachment_6496" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-6496" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/27/james-okeefe-joe-basel-and-cohorts-face-reduced-charges-in-break-in-scandal/okeefe-giles/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6496 " title="okeefe giles" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/okeefe-giles-500x336.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="202" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(October 20, 2009 - Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images North America)</p></div>
<p>James O&#8217;Keefe, Joe Basel, Robert Flanagan, and Stan Dai are in the news again this week/weekend as it appears the long and drawn out saga of the &#8220;Louisiana Four&#8221; is finally heading toward a conclusion.  Federal prosecutors have reportedly reduced charges against the men in exchange for guilty pleas.  They are all now being charged with a misdemeanor &#8211; entering a Federal Building under false pretenses &#8211; a crime punishable by up to six months in prison.  The &#8220;scandal&#8221; centered around what amounted to not much more than a teenage prank on Senator Landrieu&#8217;s office staff although it was widely reported to be a heinous act of espionage.</p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' ><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iOPYG88jeK2TsjGuir7DJFttW5NQD9EMKRF80">Associated Press</a>:  NEW ORLEANS — Federal prosecutors filed reduced charges Friday against conservative activist James O&#8217;Keefe and three others who were accused of trying to tamper with the phones in Sen. Mary Landrieu&#8217;s New Orleans office.</p>
<p>The new charges are contained in a bill of information, which typically signals a plea deal. The new filing charges the four with entering a federal building under false pretenses, a misdemeanor. They had been arrested Jan. 25 on felony charges.</p>
<p>O&#8217;Keefe, a videographer famous for wearing a pimp costume in a stunt that embarrassed the ACORN community organizing group, has said the group was trying to investigate complaints that constituents calling Landrieu&#8217;s office couldn&#8217;t get through to criticize her support of a health care reform bill.</p>
<p>Eddie Castaing, an attorney for another defendant, Joseph Basel, said his client agreed to plead guilty to the new charge so he can &#8220;resolve the case and move forward with his life.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no agreement on sentencing,&#8221; Castaing said. &#8220;It&#8217;s up to the judge.&#8221;</p>
<p>The new charges carry maximum sentences of six months in prison and a $5,000 fine. A date for their next court appearance has not been set.</p>
<p>J. Garrison Jordan, a lawyer for defendant Robert Flanagan, said his client has &#8220;an agreement worked out with the government&#8221; but wouldn&#8217;t elaborate.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s a fair resolution to the charges, and I&#8217;m happy with the agreement we&#8217;ve worked out,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Landrieu issued a statement Friday in which she said the four men &#8220;deliberately deceived both building security and my staff by using phony identities.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Clearly they were up to no good,&#8221; she said. &#8220;These charges indicate that it was not merely an innocent prank. It was a blatant violation of the law that carries with it serious consequences.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lawyers for the other two defendants didn&#8217;t immediately return calls. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney&#8217;s office in New Orleans would not comment on a possible plea deal.</p>
<p>Federal authorities initially accused the four of trying to tamper with Landrieu&#8217;s phones, but the new filing merely says they planned to pretend to test the phone system.</div>
<p>I already swallowed my pride and <a href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/07/my-official-apology-to-joe-basel-and-james-okeefe/" target="_blank">admitted I was wrong</a> on this one, so I won&#8217;t get into that yet again, but I will say that I am happy to see this case moving toward resolution.  I do find it somewhat laughable that in a month where ACORN &#8211; the group O&#8217;Keefe is now famous for exposing for their corrupt practices &#8211; is restructuring and reorganizing, the Louisiana Four is about to do federal jail time when none of ACORN&#8217;s leadership has been brought to justice.  Go figure.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/27/james-okeefe-joe-basel-and-cohorts-face-reduced-charges-in-break-in-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right Wing Extremists: March 8 2010</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/08/right-wing-extremists-march-8-2010/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=right-wing-extremists-march-8-2010</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/08/right-wing-extremists-march-8-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertartian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


California: A Fiscal Lesson the Democrats Refuse to Learn &#8211; Lonely Conservative
(I know, quite a few Republicans have been almost as bad as the Democrats. But they’re not in power right now, and if we elect the right candidates there’s hope for the GOP.)  All one has to do is look to California for proof [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F03%252F08%252Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010%22%20%7D);"></div>
<h3 id="post-17356"><a rel="attachment wp-att-5138" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/01/12/right-wing-news/right_wing_declaration/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5138" title="right_wing_declaration" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/right_wing_declaration-500x328.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a></h3>
<h3><a title="California: A Fiscal Lesson the Democrats Refuse to Learn" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.lonelyconservative.com/2010/03/07/california-a-fiscal-lesson-the-democrats-refuse-to-learn/" target="_blank">California: A Fiscal Lesson the Democrats Refuse to Learn</a> &#8211; Lonely Conservative</h3>
<p>(I know, quite a few Republicans have been almost as bad as the Democrats. But they’re not in power right now, and if we elect the right candidates there’s hope for the GOP.)  All one has to do is look to California for proof that liberal policies are a disaster. But the liberals still think they can solve the problem by raising taxes. Amazing. (Via<a href="http://nalert.blogspot.com/2010/03/billions-in-red-ink-drowning.html" target="_blank">Newsalert</a>, via <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/95215/" target="_blank">Instapundit</a>) And <a href="http://www.weaselzippers.net/blog/2010/03/cnn-reports-on-second-graders-letter-campaign-to-gov-mr-schnitzelager-snockledoodleschwarzenegger-to.html" target="_blank">this sort of thing</a> certainly doesn’t help matters. Unfortunately, my state, New York, is following in California’s foot steps.</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<h1><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/03/media-fraud-just-a-cup-of-coffee-my-ass/" target="_blank">Media Fraud – Just A Cup Of Coffee My Ass</a> &#8211; Founding Bloggers</h1>
<p>This latest example of mainstream media fraud comes from St. Louis, and features coverage of the so called “Coffee Party”.  The following clip is only 2 minutes long, so watch all of it, and then look at the images below to understand why this video is nothing short of media prostitution for their progressive cause.</p>
<p><a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/round-2-conservative-blogger-debate-war.html" target="_blank">Scratcher</a> was all over this last week&#8230;</p>
<h2><a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/coffee-tea-or.html" target="_blank">Coffee, Tea, or&#8230;?</a> Makes My Brain Itch</h2>
<p>-</p>
<p><a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/cyberwar-hype/" target="_blank"><strong>The Classic Liberal</strong></a> links us in his <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/right-wing-links-march-7-2010/" target="_blank">Right-Wing Links</a> and posts<a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/consent-governed/" target="_blank"> this excerpt</a> from <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Sunday_Reflections/Consent-of-the-governed---and-the-lack-thereof-86628027.html" target="_blank">Glenn Reynolds</a> article in the Washington Times.</p>
<p>-</p>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/what-is-the-job-of-our-elected-officials/" target="_blank">What is the job of our elected officials?</a> &#8211; POLITICAL REALITIES</h2>
<p>Comment by Mr. Pink Eyes in Larry’s post “Obama – Time to make a decision”: “I also would like to know who he thinks he is. He is supposed to act on the will of the people, not enact laws against the will of the people just because he feels it is right. He needs to remember that he works for us, we pay his salary.”</p>
<h2>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</h2>
<h2><strong>Check this one out folks.  Lots of great minds collaborating in one place&#8230;</strong></h2>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >We are <a href="http://the-resistance.posterous.com/">The Resistance</a>.</p>
<p>The <em>Conservative</em> Resistance.  It&#8217;s a new group blog created by Steve from <a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/">MotorCityTimes.com</a>. Also on board are <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/">The Classic Liberal</a>, my fellow Jerseyans at <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/">That&#8217;s Right</a>, and <a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/">Gator Doug</a>.  And just to make things interesting they included me!</p>
<p>We will resist Barack Obama&#8217;s vision of a socialist America with every fiber of our being. We will stand athwart history yelling &#8220;STOP&#8221;. And we will never, ever immanentize the eschaton.</div>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p><a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/" target="_blank">MOTOR CITY TIMES</a> - <strong><a title="Permanent Link to Obama Is Demonizing Insurance Companies To Achieve His Dream Of Socialized Medicine" rel="bookmark" href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/obama-is-demonizing-insurance-companies-to-achieve-his-dream-of-socialized-medicine/" target="_blank">Obama Is Demonizing Insurance Companies To Achieve His Dream Of Socialized Medicine</a></strong></p>
<p>This is nothing more than propaganda. The health insurance industry is heavily regulated and if they are a non-profit like Blue Cross they have even more hurdles to cover.</p>
<p>If Obama’s real goal was to provide more access to uninsured people he could, and really shoul, focus on insurance reform.</p>
<p>-</p>
<h2><a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/03/an-appropriate-fate.html" target="_blank">An appropriate fate (UPDATED)</a> &#8211; <a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/03/mr-job-hashems-redemption-of-job-hashems-redemption-of-himself-hashem-talks-with-and-listens-to-his-.html" target="_blank">Washington Rebel</a></h2>
<p><em>A US-born spokesman for <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on al-Qaida" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/al-qaida">al-Qaida</a> has been arrested, Pakistani authorities said today , hailing an intelligence coup that struck a blow at the organisation&#8217;s public relations apparatus.</em></p>
<p><em>Reports of the arrest of Adam Gadahn in Karachi came on the same day the California-born American appeared in a web video in which he called on American Muslims to launch attacks in the US.</em></p>
<p><em>Gadahn, the first American to be charged with treason since the second world war era, is one of the FBI&#8217;s top 10 most wanted terrorists and has had a $1m reward offered for information leading to his capture.</em></p>
<p>Extradition?</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/7/sarah-palin-is-worse-than-hitler.html" target="_blank">Sarah Palin is Worse Than Hitler</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/7/abc-pulls-its-programming-from-cablevision.html" target="_blank">Russ</a> at <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/7/the-right-wing-blog-debate-dustup-sarah-palin-edition-episod.html" target="_blank">That&#8217;s Right</a></h2>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<h2><a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/odds_n_ends/keystone-kops-seize-unlicensed-beer" target="_blank">Keystone Kops Swoop in to Seize Unlicensed Beer </a>- The Wy Blog</h2>
<p>Benjamin Franklin is spinning in his grave. The man who once said that &#8220;beer is proof that God loves us&#8221; never envisioned the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. The Keystone Kops have a list of Officially Licensed Beer and <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20100308_Troopers_raid_popular_bars_for_unlicensed_beers__Dozens_of_gallons_seized_after__citizen_complaint_.html?cmpid=41144277">woe unto you if yours isn&#8217;t on the list</a>.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/hotmail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010" title="Hotmail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/live.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Hotmail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/myspace?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010" title="MySpace" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/myspace.png" width="16" height="16" alt="MySpace"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/yahoo_mail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010" title="Yahoo Mail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/yahoo.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Yahoo Mail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fright-wing-extremists-march-8-2010%2F&amp;linkname=Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%208%202010" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/08/right-wing-extremists-march-8-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Blogger Debate: Sarah Palin Edition</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/08/conservative-blogger-debate-sarah-palin-edition/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=conservative-blogger-debate-sarah-palin-edition</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/08/conservative-blogger-debate-sarah-palin-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you unfortunate enough to find yourself enamored with the Alaskan maverick, I must tell you from the "get-go" that I see your conservative rockstar as nothing more than an uber-popular political talking head.  I think her reach extends to her audience and her audience alone.... and her impact is minimal at best and will remain as such until she slowly fades into the background of the political theater never to be seen or heard from ever again.  I do not discount her popularity or even her following.  I simply see her career evolution taking her in the direction of a Glenn Beck (or dare I say Oprah Winfrey) rather than that of a Ronald Reagan or even a GW.  The very idea of Palin (at any point in the future) having an impact on the nation's economy in my mind is tantamount to thinking cheerleaders have an impact on the outcomes of football games.  She can no more impact our nation's economy than can Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Levin, or my seven year old nephew for that matter, but in the spirit of this "debate" I will forge ahead nonetheless and play along.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F03%252F08%252Fconservative-blogger-debate-sarah-palin-edition%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%3A%20Sarah%20Palin%20Edition%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/2008/11/01-07/sarah-palin2_798100c.jpg" alt="" width="368" height="230" /></p>
<p>For the second round of the <a href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/02/round-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/" target="_blank">conservative blogger debate series</a>, yours truly and <a href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/03/02/fdr-and-terrorists-and-spies-oh-my%E2%80%A6/" target="_blank">Don </a>from <a href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/" target="_blank">Conservative Hideout 2.0</a> and <a href="http://presentdiscontent.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/happy-99th-birthday-ronald-reagan/" target="_blank">Present Discontent</a> are discussing the conservative starlet Sarah Palin.  <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/7/abc-pulls-its-programming-from-cablevision.html" target="_blank">Russ at That&#8217;s Right</a> and the <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/consent-governed/" target="_blank">Classic Liberal</a> are moderating, so expect the unexpected in terms of the questions they may come up with.  Here&#8217;s question number one&#8230;</p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Present economic conditions being what they are (<a href="http://www.bls.gov/cps/">9.7% unemployment</a>;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61029V20100201" target="_blank">projected 1.5 trillion budget deficit</a>;<a href="http://www.heritage.org/research/features/budgetchartbook/obama-budget-increase-debt-26-percent-gdp.aspx">skyrocketing national debt</a>; etc.) what impact, if any, do you think Sarah Palin’s prior actions as governor or policy pronouncements more recently, would have on any given specific economic indicator or the economy in general? Don’t feel restrained to the indicators given in your answer. Specific examples of her implemented policies/pronouncements are encouraged but not necessarily required.</p>
<p>—-</p>
<p>Ed: This is not intended to be a referendum on <strong>why</strong> we are where we are but rather a question on whether the debaters think Sarah Palin’s prior actions and more recent words if implemented would have any impact (good, bad or indifferent) on the situation as it exists.</div>
<p>Here&#8217;s a piece of Don&#8217;s answer&#8230;.</p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >Sarah Palin is many things to many people, a lightning rod of unfair criticism for the left, a mother, a wife and among other things, a strong conservative. Not only that, Sarah Palin is a Reagan Conservative, so that means she is very fiscally conservative. Under the guidelines of the question above, with her self professed “Common Sense Conservatism” it would be easy to predict that she would have a very positive impact on the American economy. Therefore, I want to review her fiscal policies she enacted as both a mayor and a governor.</p>
<p>As Mayor of Wasilla, AK she cut property taxes by a huge margin of 75%, offsetting it with a 2% sales tax increase that had been enacted before she took office. Additionally she eliminated business inventory and personal property taxes. This increased the business climate in Wasilla, prompting the Boston Globe to quote a local business man who credits Sarah with making the town “more of a community…It’s no longer a little strip town that you can blow through in a heartbeat.” She also kept a jar on her desk with all the names of the residents of Wasilla in it and once a week, she would randomly choose a name, call that person and elicit their thoughts on how the town was doing. Her fiscal actions helped her to win re-election as Mayor with 75% of the vote.</div>
<p>Check out his <a href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/03/08/blog-debate-sarah-palin-the-economy/" target="_blank">full remarks here</a>&#8230;. and <a href="http://presentdiscontent.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/blog-debate-sarah-palin-the-economy/" target="_blank">here</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>I feel I must state at the onset that I wholeheartedly object to the first question offered in this &#8220;debate&#8221; with every ounce of my being.  I cannot &#8211; even for a second &#8211; consider the alternate reality that would have to present itself and suck me in for Sarah Palin to actually have an impact on our nation&#8217;s economic future, so I am admittedly struggling to formulate a response to Don&#8217;s post and want to beat Russ with an Old Hickory switch for even offering up this miserable question.</p>
<p>For those of you unfortunate enough to find yourself enamored with the Alaskan maverick, I must tell you from the &#8220;get-go&#8221; that I see your conservative rockstar as nothing more than an uber-popular political talking head.  I think her reach extends to her audience and her audience alone&#8230;. and her impact is minimal at best and will remain as such until she slowly fades into the background of the political theater never to be seen or heard from <em>ever</em> again.  I do not discount her popularity or even her following.  I simply see her career evolution taking her in the direction of a Glenn Beck (or dare I say Oprah Winfrey) rather than that of a Ronald Reagan or even a GW.  The very idea of Palin (at any point in the future) having an impact on the nation&#8217;s economy in my mind is tantamount to thinking cheerleaders have an impact on the outcomes of football games.  She can no more impact our nation&#8217;s economy than can Beck, Hannity, Coulter, or my seven year old nephew for that matter; but in the spirit of this &#8220;debate&#8221; I will forge ahead nonetheless and play along.</p>
<p>So I guess the premise has to go something like this&#8230; At some point in the future, Sarah Palin becomes something or someone capable of impacting the economic future of this great country&#8230; (See.. I&#8217;m really struggling with this.  I mean is someone going to make her head of the Fed for Christ&#8217;s sake &#8211; because I know we&#8217;re not talking President??  Are we?)</p>
<p>I guess what we&#8217;re really trying to get at here is the meat of Sarah Palin&#8217;s economic pronouncements / policies&#8230;both recently and while she served as mayor of Wasilla and Governor of Alaska.  I think I can muster up the strength to discuss the points offered by Don, but I fail to see where much &#8220;debate&#8221; will come from this either &#8211; so prepare yourself for a bit of a ramble from me on this one.  As I have stated many, many, many times on this site&#8230; I DO NOT DISAGREE WITH SARAH PALIN on the vast majority of issues.  In fact, my disdain for Gov Palin comes from the very fact that she&#8217;s the queen of offering up exactly what I want to hear.  She&#8217;s read the token conservative playbook cover to cover, and I firmly believe she places head to pillow every evening memorizing talking points with the hope of dropping a noteworthy post via Facebook before her morning moose hunt.</p>
<p>I do admit that its not fair to criticize Sarah Palin for giving me exactly what I want, but ask any of my former girlfriends and they will certainly tell you that giving me what I want (in G.I. Joe terms) is only <em>half the battle</em> &#8211; and who ever said I had to be fair in the first place?  I simply need more&#8230; I need to know that <em>you know</em> why I want <span style="text-decoration: underline;">what I want</span> &#8211; and that&#8217;s where Sarah Palin loses me.  She knows I want lower taxes, smaller government, etc, etc&#8230;  so she force feeds it to me day after day.  If she is the great communicator and conduit for relating to &#8220;everyday&#8221; Americans as everyone tells me that she is, shouldn&#8217;t she be the one to begin explaining to the American People how we as conservatives have come to those positions &#8211; or more importantly how we&#8217;re going to put talk into action?  If she is the common man&#8217;s woMAN of choice, why hasn&#8217;t she realized that the vast majority of her followers couldn&#8217;t connect the Tenth Amendment with States&#8217; Rights if they were sitting with a copy of the Bill of Rights in their Right hand and the Declaration in their left because people like Sarah Palin have gone so long without referencing the two openly and honestly that they&#8217;ve all but become an afterthought.  Perhaps even more troubling is the fact that its approaching the point of impossibility to assume that anyone can sift through the token conservative Republican model rhetoric and ramblings to understand that ideas like &#8220;universal health care,&#8221; job creation, and bank bailouts are counter to the intentions of our Founders on the most fundamental of levels &#8211; and that even engaging in the dialog about these topics without having a constitutional discussion discredits, disgraces, and attempts to destroy the very documents our Forefathers created.  They aren&#8217;t simply Democratic creations Republicans must oppose, they are threats to our very system of government.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t a political figure so in touch with the needs, wants, and interests of her right-wing supporters (she did have that bowl of names in Wasilla &#8211; which when viewed through the <em>who gives a shit</em> looking glass sounds a great deal like President Obama&#8217;s Ten Letters he reads every night) understand that the red meat doesn&#8217;t carry the day 365 in Washington.  Being conservative is about a great deal more than being able to recite the Mount Vernon Statement or <a href="http://republicanredefined.com/2009/11/24/stupid-republicans-their-friggin-lists/" target="_blank">whatever list</a> of campaign issues Republicans are rallying around for the day, week, month.  If she is the great hope of &#8220;common folks&#8221; everywhere and not just another Great White Hype, why isn&#8217;t she at the forefront of framing these debates in a more reflective light &#8211; one that pays homage &#8211; not lip-service to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?  One that begins to remind Americans that Republicans and conservatives support those laundry list issues because of our adherence to Founding principles?</p>
<p>I think the answer is two-fold.  One.  I think she knows the current climate and I think she knows what sells.  Car salesmen in the 50&#8217;s weren&#8217;t running ads boasting fuel economy and Victoria&#8217;s Secret isn&#8217;t buying spots to talk about where their bras are manufactured (trust me on that one folks &#8211; ladies check out that label next time your slipping one on or gentleman next time your fumbling through taking one off &#8211; it ain&#8217;t Detroit).  Its just easier to put out there what people want according to the passions of the day, and to drive the point home by showing them exactly what they want to see and telling them what they want to hear.  Sarah Palin is a marketing genius in this regard.  She knows riled up right-wingers want to hear right-wing rhetoric and they want their daily does of red meat &#8211; and who can blame them after a year of this madness and eight years of &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism?&#8221;</p>
<p>Two.  I think Palin knows that if she goes that route she runs the risk of being torn apart by academics &#8211; both on the Left and on the Right.  Now this is not where I go David Brooks on you folks&#8230; I simply think many &#8211; like Palin &#8211; have allowed themselves to believe that historical and constitutional analysis of issues is just too complicated to explain on a case by case basis &#8211; and the reality is that it is anything but.  Christians use the Ten Commandments as a point of reference on a daily basis &#8211; and that &#8220;little&#8221; piece of literary brilliance tells them what they <em>can&#8217;t do</em> rather than what they <em>can do</em> as it is presented under the format laid out in the Bill of Rights.  Why isn&#8217;t that one easier to reference?</p>
<p>It should be, but for some reason, it is a foreign document to many like Sarah Palin.  They reference it when convenient for their talking points, but they rarely rely upon it.  Doing so would expose too many of the hypocrisies in their overall message.   That First Amendment is pretty tricky and has been broadly interpreted, but the pesky little Separation of Church and State business is a bit tough to sell for many on the Right when examined under strict interpretation.  Explaining the constitutional foundation for specific debates, issues, and controversies becomes somewhat complicated when doing so establishes a paper trail that can come back to haunt them on the &#8220;big issues&#8221; like abortion or gay marriage &#8230; and we all know Gov Palin only loosely adheres to that <em>Free Speech</em> nonsense &#8211; just ask Rahm / Rush&#8230;</p>
<p>So you ask&#8230; how does any of this relate to Palin&#8217;s impact on our economic future??? Right now, I see Palin as a one trick pony.  If she can trade in the talking points and bone up on the rarely-used practice of strict interpretation and start to flesh out a few of her talking points, I think she could have a tremendous impact on the economic future of this great nation because she could use her broad range of support to remind the American people that our Founding Fathers gave us the answers to the problems we now face &#8211; more than 200 years ago.  They created a model that guaranteed individual liberty and has allowed capitalism to flourish for more than two centuries.  If Palin can lead us back to those roots&#8230; even I will follow.</p>
<p>The only people in this great nation that can directly impact our nation&#8217;s economic future (positively) are the American people themselves.  They need to be reminded that our federal government was never intended to do even a fraction of what it does by personally granted mandate in the current hour &#8211; not blinded to that reality by bumper stickers and campaign slogans.  As I stated earlier, in theory I wholeheartedly support most of the initiatives and actions mentioned by Don in his post.  That said, my initial objections to this question were exacerbated by reading Don&#8217;s endorsement of her record and by extension her potential impact on the national economy because while I love &#8220;lower taxes,&#8221; selling off private jets, and dropping per diem expenses&#8230; that just not telling me much.  In fact, thats not holding much water with me at all because our current President promised a middle class tax cut, dropped his fleet of private helicopters, and his wife even put their kids on a diet &#8211; and I&#8217;m thinking that&#8217;s not <em>working out for me</em> too well.   Talking points are great folks, but I&#8217;m not buying stock in Palin Corp, and I&#8217;m not wagering the economic future of the great nation on the hope that she means what she says and an anecdote from a local citizen telling me she could make this nation more of a &#8220;community.&#8221;</p>
<p>The body of evidence is simply too small folks, and that is why without further explanation from Governor Palin, I cannot allow myself to drink the Kool-Aid and believe she has any role to play greater than what is already behind us.  Personally, I believe she is the fine conservative she says she is.  I make that statement purely on faith and accordingly it has little merit, but I do believe she means what she says.  I simplyfail to see how she is in any way, shape, form, or fashion capable of putting to work and bring to fruition any of what she allegedly believes in.  I think far too many have christened her the chosen one without even asking the question &#8211; does she want it even if she&#8217;s capable of doing it?  I think Palin is content playing political pundit; and as long as that is where she remains, I will support her, listen to her, pay money to hear her speak&#8230; but the second she becomes something else or something more&#8230; I&#8217;m going to need some answers.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>Make sure to check out <a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Makes My Brain Itch</a>, <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/cyberwar-hype/" target="_blank">Classic Liberal</a>, <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/7/sarah-palin-is-worse-than-hitler.html" target="_blank">That&#8217;s Right</a>, <a href="http://fishersvillemike.blogspot.com/2010/03/debating-sarah-palin.html">Fishersville Mike</a>, and <a href="http://mindnumbedrobot.blogspot.com/2010/03/conservative-blogger-debate-sarah-palin.html" target="_blank">Mind Numbed Robot</a> for commentary and the inevitable criticism of my position on Gov Palin&#8230;</p>
<p>____</p>
<p>Don&#8217;s Response is up&#8230; Check it out <a href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/03/09/sarah-palin-the-economy-pt-2/">here. </a></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/08/conservative-blogger-debate-sarah-palin-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 2: The Conservative Blogger Debate &#8211; The War On Terror</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/02/round-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=round-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/02/round-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemptive war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Round Two of the Conservative Blogger Debate focusing on the Global War on Terror.  Topic dejure is &#8220;PREEMPTION&#8221; folks&#8230; So this should be a good one.
The First Remarks from The Classic Liberal&#8230;.
Here&#8217;s Russ at That&#8217;s Right&#8217;s Response&#8230;.
The Classic Liberal offered this Rebuttal&#8230;
Check out Makes My Brain Itch, The Wy Blog, Washington Rebel, Motor City Times,  Theo Spark, and Present [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F03%252F02%252Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20-%20The%20War%20On%20Terror%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.yourdemocracy.net.au/drupal/files/images/pre-emption%20rules%20......preview.jpg" alt="" width="307" height="181" /></p>
<p>Round Two of the Conservative Blogger Debate focusing on the Global War on Terror.  Topic <em>dejure</em> is &#8220;PREEMPTION&#8221; folks&#8230; So this should be a good one.</p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >&#8220;A lot of the controversy over the war, particularly in Iraq, stems from the fact that our actions were pre-emptive.</p>
<p>With respect to pre-emptive military action, please explain what you consider an acceptable threshold for American action. For example: Should we wait until an attack has been launched but not yet struck (re: Paul) before acting? Should we act when we have &#8220;reasonable suspicion&#8221; that another country or entity is actively planning violence against us? Should we act against any state or nation that we know wishes to cause us harm, before they have the opportunity to organize an act of violence against us?</p>
<p>Where do we draw that &#8220;line in the sand&#8221;?</div>
<p><strong><span style="color: #000000;">The First Remarks from The </span></strong><a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/how-to-big-time-blogger/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Classic Liberal&#8230;.</span></strong></a></p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >I believe that&#8217;s an oversimplification of Paul&#8217;s foreign policy, but a) I don&#8217;t think he manages media sound-bytes as well as he should, and b) I&#8217;m not here to talk about him anyways. I&#8217;m here to debate <em>my</em> position <em>against</em> our current war strategery.</p>
<p>To begin with, I&#8217;m against any form of <em>pre-crime</em>. It&#8217;s simply too Orwellian for me. Whether it be locking people up at home, or killing them abroad, the very idea of pre-crime can only take us down the dark path towards tyranny.</p>
<p>But does that mean we have to be attacked prior to taking any action? Of course not. Let&#8217;s turn to <a title="Of the State of War" href="http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr03.htm" target="_blank">John Locke</a> for insight:</p>
<p>Read the rest <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror-%E2%80%93-question-2/" target="_blank">here&#8230;.</a></p>
<p></div>
<p><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Here&#8217;s Russ at <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/2/a-justice-mcnamara-dispatch-this-is-what-i-want.html" target="_blank">That&#8217;s Right&#8217;s</a> Response&#8230;.</span></strong></p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' ><em>(CL in bold)</em></p>
<p><strong>“To begin with, I’m against any form of pre-crime”:</strong></p>
<p>What “crime”? Killing terrorists who we’re absolutely certain want to kill us is a “crime”? According to whom? I challenge this premise at the basest level. For pretty much the exact same reasons why KSM should not be entitled to <em>our</em> Constitutional criminal law protections, there is no reason why application of our criminal law standards should be extended to foreign wars. Something is a “crime” here only because we, through our elected representatives, say it is. In my humble opinion there is no such thing as a “crime” when American soldiers are defending our God-given right to exist and live as we see fit.</p>
<p><strong>“…violating UN resolutions isn’t [a just reason for attacking Iraq]”</strong>:</p>
<p>Says who? I would agree with this only in the sense that I couldn’t care less what the UN says about anything. There is no credible argument to support a claim by anyone that we are bound by any UN resolution, for or against. By definition, doing so is an abdication of our sovereignty and therefore invalid. The UN simply should not be a factor in any decision we make to go to war.</p>
<p><strong>“…we’ve built 2 Islamic States…”</strong></p>
<p>This is a popular refrain but it is both misleading and irrelevant. To directly answer the question posed, the only metric relevant in deciding on a “line in the sand” is whether it is ‘more likely than not’ that a given enemy will inflict American casualties. As I mentioned in round 1, if we can “build” an Islamic state that is less of a threat to us than the predecessor nation, that’s a good thing. The goal is to build one that isn’t a threat <em>at all</em> and I for one would keep trying until we get it right. American lives depend on it.</p>
<p>While quantifying this “line” is admittedly difficult, the best analogy I can come up with is the budget reconciliation process; we need 51 “votes” out of a 100 to justly attack anyone. Those “votes” include considerations too numerous to mention here, but if collectively they add up to “more likely than not”, we are perfectly within our rights as a nation to preemptively attack. The “laws of war”, to the extent such ever really existed, have changed. Sworn enemies of the United States with access to ICBM’s and nuclear warheads must be dealt with swiftly and convincingly. Again, any resort to a corresponding American criminal justice standard is both in vain and irrelevant.</p>
<p><strong>“…in the execution of our current war strategery, we’ve actively reduced our freedoms at home. Isn’t that exactly what the enemy wants?”</strong></p>
<p>Read the rest of his response <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/2/the-right-wing-blog-debate-dustup-round-2.html">here&#8230;</a></p>
<p></div>
<p><strong><span style="color: #000000;">The Classic Liberal offered <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/round-1-conservative-blogger-debate-war-on-terror-question-2-response/">this Rebuttal&#8230;</a></span></strong></p>
<div class='stb-grey_box' >While I did say that we shouldn&#8217;t act &#8220;pre-emptively,&#8221; and correctly compared this to a popular Tom Cruise movie, I also stated in no uncertain terms that <strong>we need not wait until actually being attacked</strong>. I also stated clearly who we should have attacked (after finishing the job in Afghanistan), and detailed why they were a much more clear and present danger as compared to Iraq.</p>
<p>If violating UN sanctions is reason enough for the United States to go to war, then we must accept them as our governing regime. This would include, of course, adopting their tyrannical &#8220;human rights&#8221; laws over our system of inalienable rights, and their bizarre &#8220;hate crime&#8221; laws among others. I reject all of this in favor of our Declaration and Constitution.</p>
<p>America first.</p>
<p>If you understand what an Islamic State is, then you must accept that they exist to either convert or kill the infidel. By law, an Islamic State cannot accept ours (or anyone else&#8217;s) freedoms. So unless we wish to adopt a more &#8220;politically-correct&#8221; understanding of Sharia law, building 2 Islamic States is indeed a strong gain for radical Islam.</p>
<p>As Lord Acton famously warned, <em>&#8220;power corrupts.&#8221;</em> Unfortunately, these are some of the truest words ever spoken. Yes, <a title="FBI Tried to Cover Patriot Act Abuses With Flawed, Retroactive Subpoenas, Audit Finds" href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/03/fbi-tried-to-co/" target="_blank">our government has violated our rights by abusing the Patriot Act</a>, an Orwellian piece of legislation that was never needed in the first place.</p>
<p>Our Constitution may present roadblocks for those who believe in power, but in no way does the plain language of the Constitution impede anyone from taking whatever actions are necessary to protect our way of life. We know for example, that our intelligence services had plenty of advanced warnings prior to 9/11. It was not a lack of laws and power that prevented them from stopping the attack. It was mere incompetence. In other words, there was no need to alter the 4th amendment among others, which the Patriot Act does.</p>
<p>There is never a moment in life where compromising your principles makes sense. While one should certainly be &#8220;wise as a serpent,&#8221; one must still remain &#8220;innocent as a dove.&#8221; Nations are no different. Just look where compromising our principles has gotten us &#8211; a quagmire of war, a quagmire of debt, and a quagmire of progressivism.</p>
<p>And finally, as I stated in my initial answer to the question, this isn&#8217;t about Ron Paul. Anyone who thinks it is, is fighting a ghost.</div>
<p>Check out <a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/round-2-conservative-blogger-debate-war.html" target="_blank">Makes My Brain Itch</a>, <a href="http://wyblog.us/misc/important-announcement" target="_blank">The Wy Blog</a>, <a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/03/and-so-it-begins.html" target="_blank">Washington Rebel</a>, <a href="http://www.motorcitytimes.com/mct" target="_blank">Motor City Times</a>,  <a href="http://www.theospark.net/2010/03/round-1-conservative-blogger-debate-war.html" target="_blank">Theo Spark</a>, and <a href="http://presentdiscontent.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Present Discontent</a> for more commentary on Round Two of the debate.</p>
<p>Cartoon Image &#8211;  Gus Lionisky via YourDemocracy.net</p>

<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20%26%238211%3B%20The%20War%20On%20Terror" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20%26%238211%3B%20The%20War%20On%20Terror" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/hotmail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20%26%238211%3B%20The%20War%20On%20Terror" title="Hotmail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/live.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Hotmail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/myspace?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20%26%238211%3B%20The%20War%20On%20Terror" title="MySpace" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/myspace.png" width="16" height="16" alt="MySpace"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/yahoo_mail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20%26%238211%3B%20The%20War%20On%20Terror" title="Yahoo Mail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/yahoo.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Yahoo Mail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fround-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Round%202%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate%20%26%238211%3B%20The%20War%20On%20Terror" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/02/round-2-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right Wing Extremists: March 1, 2010</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/01/right-wing-extremists-march-1-2010/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=right-wing-extremists-march-1-2010</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/01/right-wing-extremists-march-1-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makes my brain itch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thats right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whited sepulchre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been a bit MIA the last few days and I apologize for that - as if any of you really care - but thanks for indulging me.  While I haven't been doing a great deal of writing, I have been carrying on with my daily journey around the conservative blogosphere.  To prove that I haven't just been being lazy, here are a few posts/articles/ramblings I've bookmarked in recent days.  Have a look.  Like I've told you before.  You can learn just as much about me from who I'm reading as you can from what I'm writing about..  

Man is that a dangerous statement.  Ten bucks says that one comes back to haunt me some day....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F03%252F01%252Fright-wing-extremists-march-1-2010%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Right%20Wing%20Extremists%3A%20March%201%2C%202010%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5138" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/01/12/right-wing-news/right_wing_declaration/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5138" title="right_wing_declaration" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/right_wing_declaration.jpg" alt="" width="342" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a bit MIA the last few days and I apologize for that &#8211; as if any of you really care &#8211; but thanks for indulging me.  While I haven&#8217;t been doing a great deal of writing, I have been carrying on with my daily journey around the conservative blogosphere.  To prove that I haven&#8217;t just been being lazy, here are a few posts/articles/ramblings I&#8217;ve bookmarked in recent days.  Have a look.  Like I&#8217;ve told you before.  You can learn just as much about me from who I&#8217;m reading as you can from what I&#8217;m writing about..</p>
<p>Man is that a dangerous statement.  Ten bucks says that one comes back to haunt me some day&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/2/28/and-so-begins-the-first-ever-right-wing-blog-debate-dustup-u.html" target="_blank"><strong>Russ at That&#8217;s Right</strong></a> opened up the <a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/02/conservative-blogger-debate_28.html" target="_blank">Conservative Blogger Debate</a> with a bang with his take on the Global War on Terrorism and the role of nation building in that process.  <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/round-1-conservative-blogger-debate-war-on-terror-rebuttal/"><strong>The Classic Liberal</strong></a><strong> </strong>responded to Russ&#8217;s argument and the first round was officially under way&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Russ</strong> also offered the question&#8230;.&#8221;<a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/3/1/are-democrats-mentally-unstable.html" target="_blank">Are Democrats Mentally Unstable</a>?&#8221;  and the Classic Liberal reminded us that <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/disagree-nancy-pelosi-racist/" target="_blank">You&#8217;re a Racist if You Disagree with Nancy Pelosi</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/02/nancy-pelosi-compulsive-liar-or-victim.html"><strong>Scratcher at Makes My Brain Itch</strong></a> isn&#8217;t &#8220;<a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/03/one-failure-i-wont-hold-against-obama.html" target="_blank">Holding this Failure Against President Obama</a>&#8221; apparently nicotine addiction and alcohol use are on the shortlist of forgivable shortcomings over there &#8211; and they are certainly among the few accepted around here as well&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>The Lonely Conservative</strong> was as busy as ever.  LC is wondering why if Dems have the votes to push the HC bill through&#8230; <a href="http://www.lonelyconservative.com/2010/03/01/if-democrats-have-the-votes-to-pass-obamacare-why-havent-they-voted-yet/" target="_blank">why haven&#8217;t they done it yet?</a> LC also reports that Obama&#8217;s visit to Nevada was anything but a boost for the Reid reelection recovery team&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/laura-berman-and-her-organizing-for-america-talking-points/" target="_blank"><strong>Steve at Motor City Times</strong></a> says &#8220;You can tell you are winning the intellectual argument when <a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/laura-berman-has-a-serious-case-of-palin-derangement-syndrome/">an avowed liberal</a> pulls out the old Hypocrite card&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Conservative Hideout 2.0</strong> tells us that the &#8220;<a href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/02/28/the-truth-is-out-there/" target="_blank">Truth is out there</a>&#8221; in the health care debate and shares a poll that shows that a majority of Americans view <a href="http://conservativehideout.com/wordpress/2010/03/01/majority-of-americans-view-government-as-a-threat/" target="_blank">government as a threat</a>.</p>
<p><strong>The WyBlog </strong>warns us that a Democratic Governor is <a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/menendez-free-hc-4-illegals" target="_blank">promising health care to illegal immigrants.</a>.. and reports on Congress passing the &#8220;<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/rants/hawaii-balkanization-act" target="_blank">Hawaiian Balkanization Act</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>The </strong><a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/02/the-coming-crash-part-i-conspiracy-contd.html" target="_blank"><strong>Washington Rebel</strong></a><strong> </strong><a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/03/and-so-it-begins.html" target="_blank">offers up the first piece of punditry and reaction</a> to the Great <a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/02/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror.html" target="_blank">Conservative Blogger Debate </a>and has a little Dylan for ya..</p>
<p><strong>The Whited Sepulchre</strong> has a <a href="http://thewhitedsepulchre.blogspot.com/2010/03/weekly-radley-they-shot-corgi.html" target="_blank">picture of an ugly dog</a> and tells the story of how cops shot it. &#8211; over pot.   <a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/02/bring-me-some-reefers.html" target="_blank">Scratcher &#8220;Bring Me Some Reefers&#8221; will love this one</a>&#8230; if he hasn&#8217;t seen it.  He also has a the &#8220;<a href="http://thewhitedsepulchre.blogspot.com/2010/03/nolan-quiz.html" target="_blank">Nolan Quiz</a>&#8221; posted for you just in case you&#8217;re still trying to figure out where you fall in this whole conservative/liberal/ libertarian/ asshole thing&#8230;.</p>
<p>Mike at <a href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/downsizing-detroit/" target="_blank"><strong>Political Realities</strong></a> says Jim Bunning is &#8220;<a href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/jim-bunning-wrong-even-when-he%E2%80%99s-right/" target="_blank">Wrong even when he&#8217;s Right</a>&#8221; and shares a tip that he knows Gov Mike Huckabee isn&#8217;t running for President after seeing him at the airport this weekend because of&#8230;. &#8220;Three reasons: he has put on at least 30 pounds; he was travelling first class; and he had no posse along with him.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/03/cuban-dissident-murdered-in-the-name-of-progressive-socialism/" target="_blank"><strong>Founding Bloggers</strong></a><strong> </strong>gets the Catchy Title of the Week Award with this&#8230;.</p>
<h1><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.foundingbloggers.com/wordpress/2010/02/farrakhan-takes-credit-for-chile-earthquake/" target="_blank">Farrakhan Takes Credit For Chile Earthquake</a></h1>
<p>I know you read it&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/03/fbi-called-to-irs-building-in-ogden-utah/"><strong>Gateway Pundit</strong></a> exposes the <a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/03/revealed-medias-racist-fake-tea-party-leader-is-a-fake-hero-too/" target="_blank">MSM&#8217;s phony Tea Partier</a> and his phony military background..</p>
<p>and&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/03/chelsea-king-update-more-information-on.html" target="_blank">The Left Coast Rebel</a></strong> reports that Warren Buffet wants Obama to &#8220;<a href="http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/03/warren-buffet-wants-obama-to-start.html">Start Fresh with Obamacare</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>and ROUND OF APPLAUSE&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/02/toyotas-newest-competition-from.html" target="_blank">The Left Coast Rebel</a> topped the Google Blog Search for his <a href="http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/02/nancy-pelosi-lawmakers-should-sacrifice.html" target="_blank">piece lambasting Pelosi&#8230;</a>.  - congrats&#8230;. Its always great to see good work rewarded&#8230;</p>
<p>_____________________________________________________________________________________________</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/03/01/right-wing-extremists-march-1-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 1: The Conservative Blogger Debate- The War On Terror</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/28/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/28/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nation building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[round 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I told you yesterday that I would post for you today a debate between and among Right-wing bloggers over the issue of the 'Global War on Terror."  Round One focuses on the "nation-building" aspect of this "war" that has played a central role in many of the conversations surrounding this matter.  Russ at That's Right and The Classic Liberal took up the effort in question-answer-response-rebuttal format.  Here is the question for round one....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F02%252F28%252Fround-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Round%201%3A%20The%20Conservative%20Blogger%20Debate-%20The%20War%20On%20Terror%22%20%7D);"></div>
<div id="attachment_2403" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 366px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-2403" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2009/10/21/defense-secretary-troop-decision/afghanistan-troops/"><img class="size-full wp-image-2403 " title="afghanistan troops" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/afghanistan-troops.jpg" alt="" width="356" height="238" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(March 2, 2009 - Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images AsiaPac)</p></div>
<p>I told you yesterday that I would post for you today a debate between and among Right-wing bloggers over the issue of the &#8216;Global War on Terror.&#8221;  Round One focuses on the &#8220;nation-building&#8221; aspect of this &#8220;war&#8221; that has played a central role in many of the conversations surrounding this matter.  Russ at That&#8217;s Right and The Classic Liberal took up the effort in question-answer-response-rebuttal format.  Here is the question for round one&#8230;.</p>
<p><em> <div class='stb-grey_box' ><span style="font-style: normal;"><em><em> </em></em></span></em></p>
<p><em><em><em> </em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em> </em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em> </em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em> </em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em> </em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em></p>
<p style="display: inline !important;"><em>One of the conservative arguments against the current prosecution on the war on terrorism is the fact that, as conservatives, we should not be involved in nation building In Iraq and Afghanistan.</em></p>
<p></em></em></em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em><em>Please explain you position with respect to the fact that after our post WWII reconstruction efforts , Germany and Japan have become our 4th and 5th largest trading partners. The exchange of goods accounts for 10.6% of all of the United States foreign trade.To put this in perspective, China accounts for 12.0% of all U.S. foreign trade (2008 numbers).<span style="font-style: normal;"><em></div></em></span></em></em></p>
<h3><em></p>
<h3><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong>You can read Russ&#8217;s response <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/2/28/and-so-begins-the-first-ever-right-wing-blog-debate-dustup-u.html" target="_blank">here&#8230;.</a></strong></span></h3>
<h3><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong>The Classic Liberal responded and you can read it <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/round-1-conservative-blogger-debate-war-on-terror-rebuttal/" target="_blank">here&#8230;..</a></strong></span></h3>
<h3><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong>And last but not least&#8230; you can read Russ&#8217;s Rebuttal <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/2/28/and-so-begins-the-first-ever-right-wing-blog-debate-dustup-u.html" target="_blank">here&#8230;.</a></strong></span></h3>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p><strong>For a bit of blog-punditry / commentary&#8230;. you can check out these sites &#8211; with more to be added as they roll in &#8230;.<em>.</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/02/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror.html" target="_blank">THE WASHINGTON REBEL</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/misc/important-announcement" target="_blank">THE WYBLOG</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/02/conservative-blogger-debate_28.html">MAKES MY BRAIN ITCH</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/">MOTOR CITY TIMES</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.theospark.net/2010/03/round-1-conservative-blogger-debate-war.html" target="_blank">THEO SPARK</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://mindnumbedrobot.blogspot.com/2010/02/conservative-blogger-debate.html" target="_blank">THE MIND NUMBED ROBOT</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/the-great-conservative-debate/" target="_blank">DALEY GATOR</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p></em></h3>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/28/round-1-the-conservative-blogger-debate-the-war-on-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives To Debate the &#8220;War on Terror&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/27/conservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=conservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/27/conservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMESTIC ISSUES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOREIGN AFFAIRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


I started this blog with the objective of offering an outlet to conservatives and Republicans with an opposing or unconventional point of view.  My mission &#8211; if I have just one &#8211; is to ask the questions of &#8220;why&#8221; when others are asking only the &#8220;what&#8217;s&#8221; and the &#8220;who&#8217;s.&#8221;  On more than one occasion, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F02%252F27%252Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%5C%22War%20on%20Terror%5C%22%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5141" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/01/12/right-wing-news/dhs-certified-right-wing/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5141" title="DHS-Certified-Right-Wing" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/DHS-Certified-Right-Wing.png" alt="" width="250" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>I started this blog with the objective of offering an outlet to conservatives and Republicans with an opposing or unconventional point of view.  My mission &#8211; if I have just one &#8211; is to ask the questions of &#8220;why&#8221; when others are asking only the &#8220;what&#8217;s&#8221; and the &#8220;who&#8217;s.&#8221;  On more than one occasion, this has made me a bit of a pain in establishment Republicans and token conservatives backs&#8230; and I have loved every minute of that.  That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re here and that&#8217;s what we do..</p>
<p>Republican Redefined has now crossed the 600 post threshold (in five months) with this post, and I couldn&#8217;t be happier to use number 601 to tell all of you about an upcoming event &#8211; series of events &#8211; that will provide you with an opportunity to see Right-wingers debating Right-wingers on issues close to all our hearts.</p>
<p>As Republican Redefined has grown, our readership has grown; and so too has our relationships with other blogs/sites.  Part of that last aspect of coming to maturity has been directly related to a few sites &#8211; all of which will be contributing to this upcoming series.  I will post the sites involved below, but I guess  I should tell you what the hell I am talking about before I ramble on any further.</p>
<p>Tomorrow, <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/rapid-fire-rightness/2010/2/26/useless-thoughts-on-useless-academic-roundtables-updated-wit.html" target="_blank">Russ</a> at <a href="http://www.thats-right.com/">That&#8217;s Right</a> will begin a multi-part debate with the <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/" target="_blank">Classic Liberal </a>on the issue of our nation&#8217;s &#8220;War on Global Terrorism&#8221; &#8211; or lack thereof &#8211; depending on how you see things.  The debate will be moderated by <a href="http://makesmybrainitch.blogspot.com/2010/02/conservative-blogger-debate.html" target="_blank">Scratcher at Makes My Brain Itch</a> and <a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/coming-soon-the-conservative-blogger-debate/" target="_blank">Steve at Motor City Times</a>.  I &#8211; as well as a growing list of others &#8211; will be offering commentary and a little blog punditry &#8211; here and at their respective sites.</p>
<p>I am excited about the prospects of the &#8220;forum&#8221; &#8211; if you will &#8211; and think many of you will enjoy it as well.  The first round of question and answer will begin tomorrow at noon.  I will keep you updated on how the debate is playing out and will direct you to various sites where you can contribute as well.  If this first &#8220;issue /topic&#8221; is a success, we hope to bring you many more in the days and weeks to come.  You may even see your old pal T Christopher on the card for the next round if I get my way &#8211; I&#8217;m lobbying for a Palin-related topic &#8211; you all know I&#8217;m alone on an island with that one &#8211; for now that is. All things in time do pass my conservative friends&#8230;. ALL THINGS&#8230;.</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;re wondering&#8230;. CL and Russ have decidedly different points of view on this issue.  It should be a great first round.  Neither of them will pull any punches&#8230;</p>
<p>Contributing sites&#8230; I&#8217;ll update as more chime in&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonrebel.typepad.com/washington_rebel/2010/02/the-conservative-blogger-debate-round-i.html">Washington Rebel</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ldjackson.net/news-politics/congressman-paul-ryan-explains-health-care-reform-video/">Political Realities</a></p>
<p><a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/rule5/operation-torch">The Wyblog</a></p>
<p><a href="http://presentdiscontent.wordpress.com/">Present Discontent</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F27%2Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%26%238220%3BWar%20on%20Terror%26%238221%3B" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F27%2Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%26%238220%3BWar%20on%20Terror%26%238221%3B" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/hotmail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F27%2Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%26%238220%3BWar%20on%20Terror%26%238221%3B" title="Hotmail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/live.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Hotmail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/myspace?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F27%2Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%26%238220%3BWar%20on%20Terror%26%238221%3B" title="MySpace" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/myspace.png" width="16" height="16" alt="MySpace"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/yahoo_mail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F27%2Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%26%238220%3BWar%20on%20Terror%26%238221%3B" title="Yahoo Mail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/yahoo.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Yahoo Mail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F27%2Fconservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror%2F&amp;linkname=Conservatives%20To%20Debate%20the%20%26%238220%3BWar%20on%20Terror%26%238221%3B" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/27/conservatives-to-debate-the-war-on-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great One Mark Levin Offers Up Advice for Glenn Beck</title>
		<link>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/23/the-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck</link>
		<comments>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/23/the-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>T. CHRISTOPHER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CONSERVATISM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THE LIGHTER SIDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stacy mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the great one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicanredefined.com/?p=6170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


As someone who is still relatively new to the blogging world, I have to admit that it has been a strange transition for me to find my news and my political entertainment &#8211; if you will &#8211; from the forum that is the Internet.  I like to hear the tone of people&#8217;s voices; their delivery; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Frepublicanredefined.com%252F2010%252F02%252F23%252Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1021" href="http://republicanredefined.com/2009/09/21/pleasantly-surprised-stephen/mark-levin-3/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1021" title="mark levin" src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mark-levin2.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="259" /></a></p>
<p>As someone who is still relatively new to the blogging world, I have to admit that it has been a strange transition for me to find my news and my political entertainment &#8211; if you will &#8211; from the forum that is the Internet.  I like to hear the tone of people&#8217;s voices; their delivery; and the conviction in their statements.  I think you can learn more from hearing how a man says something than you can from actually listening to what it is he is saying.  I have been a fan and supporter of the talk radio format for as long as I can remember &#8211; I think in large part because of the fact that you can connect with a radio personality in a manner rarely found in any other medium.  You are engaged in listening rather than reacting or being distracted by other stimuli.  There are no fancy sets, hot women, video clips, or fancy graphics.  Its just the person on the other end of the frequency sharing a message with you, and I spent many a lunch break, late night, or early morning studying and/or working while listening to live broadcasts, tapes, or podcasts from my favorite conservative personalities.</p>
<p>When I moved to New York for law school, I was introduced to a talk radio personality that would take my love affair with conservative radio to a whole new level.  Surrounded by liberals for the first time in my life as a product of the Bible Belt, I sought daily refuge in the form of conservative radio.  One day while finding comfort in the voices of sane and rational minds on 770 (WABC), I heard my first broadcast offered up by Mark Levin.  From that day forward, I understood why they called him the &#8220;Great One.&#8221;</p>
<p>Levin is tough; he&#8217;s funny; he says things we all think to ourselves and would rarely say out loud &#8211; let alone say into a microphone.  From his <em><strong>hidden bunker somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building</strong></em> Mark Levin is truly the Leader of all things conservative.</p>
<p>His masterpiece <em>Men in Black: How the Supreme Court is Destroying America </em>was the only non-law school-related book (magazine, article, webpage, newsletter, newspaper, pamphlet, or non-compulsory written word) I read during the three years of &#8220;higher education.&#8221;  Some may say that makes me an idiot or a simpleton.  I say it makes me selective.</p>
<p>Anyhow, you didn&#8217;t come here to hear me rant about my appreciation for Mark Levin.  You came here for that headline, so here it is.  If you missed his show Monday night (that&#8217;s tonight/last night/or whatever depending on where you live or when you&#8217;re reading this &#8211; five days from now for most) you really need to find a way to stay on top of these things because &#8220;real&#8221; news isn&#8217;t waiting for you to catch up and my blog isn&#8217;t getting any better without your commentary so lets get on this ASAP.</p>
<p>I forgot, I&#8217;m supposed to be getting to the point&#8230; my apologies.</p>
<p>So Mark Levin &#8211; The Great One &#8211; decided to devote a portion of his show to the keynote speaker at this year&#8217;s CPAC convention- Glenn Beck.  In fairness, he didn&#8217;t go Baldwin brother on Beck, but he did offer up a little piece of advice for the Fox News dough-boy.  Check out this audio/dubbed video from <a href="http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2010/02/mark-levin-questions-glenn-becks.html">Radio Equalizer</a> via <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/94389/">Instapundit </a> and catch me below.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZdaTAjwf91k&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZdaTAjwf91k&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Tell me that wasn&#8217;t seven kinds of awesome?</p>
<p>Look.  I&#8217;m not going to roll into a rant about how much I hate Glenn Beck or even about how much I hated his speech at CPAC.  Neither would be true.  The latter would be closer to an accurate statement, but who is realistically looking for accuracy around here?  Consistency maybe&#8230;. but accuracy??? You folks know better than that.  I haven&#8217;t commented a great deal about Beck on this site for two reasons.  1) I rarely watch his show and 2) I hate hate hate his radio program.  I love the radio format, but he murders it for me and forces me to switch to ESPN radio during his time slot even if its <em>Jim Rome is Burning </em>depending on the market.  His chalkboard sideshow just doesn&#8217;t translate to the radio format, and his giggling little crew of school boys makes me want to yank the car into a tree.</p>
<p>Speaking of his little gang of yes men&#8230;. I have a small confession to make.  In a brief moment of complete and utter mental failure&#8230; as I was trying to remember the name of the nerdy little errand boy featured daily on the Glenn Beck program &#8211; so I could take a shot at him &#8211; I forgot his name.  Was it Sammy?  Sally, Suzy, Stan, Smitty, Stewie?  Hell I couldn&#8217;t remember so I Googled it and sure enough &#8211; if you Google &#8220;Smitty&#8221; and &#8220;Glenn Beck&#8221; what do you get?</p>
<p><a href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/22/funny-my-wife-says-the-same-thing/">THE OTHER MCCAIN </a></p>
<p>And sure enough&#8230; His most recent post&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<h2><a rel="bookmark" href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/23/mark-levin-vs-glenn-beck-and-some-other-cpac-related-musings/">Mark Levin vs. Glenn Beck (And Some Other CPAC-Related Musings)</a></h2>
<p>Are you kidding me?</p>
<p>Do you ever <a href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/22/video-cpac-panel-on-saving-freedom-from-fascism/">sleep McCain</a>?  Can you please get your 12 hours like <a href="http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/22/tweedle-dee-john-mccain-misled-on-stimulus/">your namesake</a>?  How do you plan to live as long as that friend-to-all changeling chameleon if you keep going at this pace?  Let Smitty do some work and sleep off that <a href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/22/lets-party-like-its-1994/">hangover</a> we both know you have from this weekend at CPAC.  Can you just let me have a moment?</p>
<p>Here I am finally able to bask in the glory of someone else in the conservative world growing tired of Beck&#8217;s cheap trick sideshow antics and you have to steal it from me?  Damn you Stacy McCain!!! Damn you.</p>
<p>Back to my original point&#8230;.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Beck fan.  I apologize &#8211; not for bashing your &#8220;homeboy&#8221; and his adolescent games, but for not taking Beck to task on a daily basis around here.  I will work on that.  I promise.  I just can&#8217;t hate the goofy bastard.  His television show sucks 90% of the time, but the other 1o% gives me hope &#8211; not hope as in I want to hold hands and sing happy songs with the dude, but hope that the next show will not suck &#8211; or at least not veer into conspiracy theory land reducing all Right-Wingers to caricatures and their message to bumper stickers.</p>
<p>The short of it is this.  Glenn Beck is a TV personality; and accordingly, he has to keep his audience coming back for more.  To serve that end, he will do anything, say anything, and raise Holy Hell about anything he can to make that happen.  That&#8217;s show business folks.  I&#8217;m proud as hell of Mark Levin for calling a dork a dork on this one and reminding Beck of his stated objective &#8211; opposing the transformation of this great nation &#8211; and I am even happier to call myself a fan of the man with the courage and conviction to do it.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/facebook.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Facebook"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/twitter.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Twitter"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/hotmail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck" title="Hotmail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/live.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Hotmail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/myspace?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck" title="MySpace" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/myspace.png" width="16" height="16" alt="MySpace"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/yahoo_mail?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck" title="Yahoo Mail" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/yahoo.png" width="16" height="16" alt="Yahoo Mail"/></a> <a href="http://www.addtoany.com/add_to/wordpress?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanredefined.com%2F2010%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck%2F&amp;linkname=The%20Great%20One%20Mark%20Levin%20Offers%20Up%20Advice%20for%20Glenn%20Beck" title="WordPress" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/icons/wordpress.png" width="16" height="16" alt="WordPress"/></a> <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://republicanredefined.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicanredefined.com/2010/02/23/the-great-one-mark-levin-offers-up-advice-for-glenn-beck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
